Patch tomorrow (notes inside)

Chit chat
Kibs
Guild hopper
Posts: 1314
Joined: 09 May 2005, 16:44
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by Kibs »

sneek wrote:
Kibs wrote:
But yeah I suppose it IS the best out there - mostly because of lack of competition.
[...] LOTRO had a tiny budget.
Careful with this, imo.

Lando was a regular from our FPS days and he bailed on WoW at around level 25.
Took too much time together with his young kids, job and family.
He's currently enjoying LOTRO and he's very very adamant it fits his social situation much more then WoW.

What goes against LOTRO I suppose is that it isn't an established brand on the PC, unlike Warcraft.
I said LOTRO did not have a tiny budget - EA likes to throw money around like there's no tomorrow :p
And yeah - comparing a multi-billion dollar franchise like LOTRO that's known by half the world ... silly me :)
Roses are red. Violets are blue. In soviet Russia, poem writes you.
User avatar
sneek
The Punisher
Posts: 4774
Joined: 08 May 2005, 23:41
Location: Netherlands

Post by sneek »

So you're saying lord of the rings was huge in the general public before the movies? :)

Going on what I heard folks chat about ten+ years ago Warcraft was buzzing among my age bracket whereas Tolkien and that Warhammer stuff wasn't on the radar.
All I'm saying is that Blizzard's setting's been simmering with the broader public longer then lotr and warhammer.
User avatar
flame
El Complicatore
Posts: 1842
Joined: 09 May 2005, 08:49

Post by flame »

sneek wrote:So you're saying lord of the rings was huge in the general public before the movies? :)

Going on what I heard folks chat about ten+ years ago Warcraft was buzzing among my age bracket whereas Tolkien and that Warhammer stuff wasn't on the radar.
All I'm saying is that Blizzard's setting's been simmering with the broader public longer then lotr and warhammer.
Tolkien in the UK is more well known than the actual Kebabs.
Complicating is the true path to simplicity.
Post Reply