Relics

Chit chat
User avatar
Gupim
High Warlord
High Warlord
Posts: 1007
Joined: 24 Aug 2005, 08:33

Post by Gupim »

rmz wrote:
so it wasnt raid related eyyy..... taking up Ramiz precious bandwidth....

ahyes Gupim is hosting ventrilo from now on ? thanks!
My crappy 10/1 line cant handle words like bög, lax and wasp so im affraid its a big nono.
"go all out, i wont lose aggro"
User avatar
Morlog
High Warlord
High Warlord
Posts: 1459
Joined: 09 Aug 2005, 10:33

Post by Morlog »

http://wow.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?witem=22395'

the +30 shock relic that dropps from magmus

(BRD past the dark furnace just before the emperor)
Disenchants into: 1 Brilliant Mind
User avatar
psythe
General
General
Posts: 503
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 16:06
Location: Uptown Uppsala

Post by psythe »

LFG to BRD ! no more shamans needed -.-

:D
User avatar
sneek
The Punisher
Posts: 4774
Joined: 08 May 2005, 23:41
Location: Netherlands

Post by sneek »

Ok. Dubbed about this a long time - better put it in writing.

Shaman get hosed with their relics.

Here's the Idol of Rejuvenation (druid).
[wowitem]22398[/wowitem]
Drops in LBRS.

Here's the Totem of Life (shaman).
[wowitem]22396[/wowitem]
Drops in AQ40, off Frankriss the Unyielding.

The ilevel 62 blue versus the ilevel 78 purple. Rare versus "Epic".
So a druid with their blue idol gets +50 to their Rejuvenation while the shaman gets only 43% of 45, which is +19, to their Lesser Healing Wave.
Full duration heal over time vs a 1.5 second casttime heal.

:|
User avatar
Gorlom
High Warlord
High Warlord
Posts: 1889
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 19:49

Post by Gorlom »

is it just me or isn't it wierd to put "up to x on spell" if its not the full x? i mean its just one single spell? we should get 100% of what it says otherwise it wont increas that spell with "up to"


my point is its a specific spell not general +spell dmg or +magic school



it just feels wierd.
Crezax wrote:If you feel you need to write something angry and insulting, write it down in Notepad, save it somewhere and look at it when you get bored.
Kibs
Guild hopper
Posts: 1314
Joined: 09 May 2005, 16:44
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by Kibs »

Gorlom wrote:is it just me or isn't it wierd to put "up to x on spell" if its not the full x? i mean its just one single spell? we should get 100% of what it says otherwise it wont increas that spell with "up to"


my point is its a specific spell not general +spell dmg or +magic school



it just feels wierd.
It's blizzards default mechanism for calculating spell / healing increasements. I somehow think it's easier for them just to stick with what they have :p
User avatar
Gorlom
High Warlord
High Warlord
Posts: 1889
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 19:49

Post by Gorlom »

yeah true but they could hav put as an added note "(the spell will only gain up to x because of mechanics)" or something.


hmm looks like all three relics of all three classes are found.

lvl 52 req:

druid: from Lord Roccor
shaman: from Magmus
paladin: from Magmus


lvl 57 req:

druid: from Mor greyhoof
shaman: hmm cant find where. seems from DM
paladin: cant find the mob for this either

seems the lvl 57 req relics drop from questmobs form the 0.5 tier set items chain


lvl 60 req:

druid: from Vicidicus
shaman: from Fankriss the Unyielding
paladin: from Fankriss the Unyielding


is the paladins really any good at all? +55 ac on aura, -20 mana on seals, -25 on mana cleanse.
Crezax wrote:If you feel you need to write something angry and insulting, write it down in Notepad, save it somewhere and look at it when you get bored.
User avatar
Morlog
High Warlord
High Warlord
Posts: 1459
Joined: 09 Aug 2005, 10:33

Post by Morlog »

the -25 mana on cleanse is actually really good as that dispells almost anything and PvE raiding is a lot of dispelling nowadays so thats quite handy although some doesnt like that it takes the place of other loot at fankriss that they want more, imo they dont value easy cheap dispelling enough the spoiled brats
Disenchants into: 1 Brilliant Mind
Post Reply