did i beat the master?

Morlog · Post by **Morlog** » 04 May 2006, 11:55

threat on tank gloves and sublety (sp?) on dps cloaks is also a good investment i guess

Zilver · Post by **Zilver** » 04 May 2006, 11:56

xen wrote:
Zilver wrote:Since im more dps than tank these days and have no way of reducing my agro on mobs, its a whole new learning step to output as much dmg without drawing agro. And off course it differs per tank. Those new to the instances are in my eyes therefor excused from pulling agro sometimes, vets however..
Pff, you have it easy. Zerker & Battle stance are inherently lower aggro, 80% of normal from the top of my head.
Oh, and I've said time and time again that people should push for Black Amnesty.

not quite so, its more like battle stance and zerk are 100% and def stance is 115% (or something around that number). Also most fury warriors are built for the HS build, and the tooltip on HS says "produces a high ammount of threat". Ah i wont argue numbers with you, but saying its easy to stay top5 dmg and not pull agro as a warrior is not quite true

Post by **sneek** » 04 May 2006, 11:57

Black Amnesty's a bit expensive, imo.
And you'd need to get a smith up to exalted with TB, ugh.

Morlog · Post by **Morlog** » 04 May 2006, 11:59

actually battle and serker have 80% and defencive 115% if ive read stuff that are true

so battle and serker stance have an inherent aggro reduction compared to rogues for example

xen · Post by **xen** » 04 May 2006, 12:00

Zilver wrote:not quite so, its more like battle stance and zerk are 100% and def stance is 115% (or something around that number). Also most fury warriors are built for the HS build, and the tooltip on HS says "produces a high ammount of threat". Ah i wont argue numbers with you, but saying its easy to stay top5 dmg and not pull agro as a warrior is not quite true

Well, chaining HS is a bad idea as DPS, you should dump your rage in BT, WW and Cleave (even if you only have one target). Although if you have a slow enough mainhand HS might be possible, depending on the tank.

xen · Post by **xen** » 04 May 2006, 12:01

Morlog wrote:actually battle and serker have 80% and defencive 115% if ive read stuff that are true

so battle and serker stance have an inherent aggro reduction compared to rogues for example

Yup, it's all in that thread which lists aggro values for all warrior skills. There should be a link somewhere on the forum, but I can't be arsed to find it.

Versus · Post by **Versus** » 04 May 2006, 12:43

http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread. ... post110973

Gupim · Post by **Gupim** » 04 May 2006, 13:18

the molten core

trash mob

>2k crit

your dot starts ticking for over 300

you regret you only have one dot on that damn mob

you start casting the next bolt as you hear "nightfall" proc and wish we had a shadowpriest that could give some extra 20% or a priest that could give you a PI and you wonder why you still didnt get a tranquil air totem

ZHC

3k 3,5k

1g repairs

damn i love it

Gorlom · Post by **Gorlom** » 04 May 2006, 13:36

why is the zandalar hero charm crossed over in yellow????

xen · Post by **xen** » 04 May 2006, 13:42

Versus wrote:http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread. ... post110973

Thanks.

3) Threat modifiers from Warrior Stances

In Battle Stance and Berserker Stance, all threat from a Warrior is multiplied by 80%. In defensive stance, the multiplier is 130%. With Defiance, it is 145%.

Zilver · Post by **Zilver** » 04 May 2006, 13:49

xen wrote:
Versus wrote:http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread. ... post110973
Thanks.

3) Threat modifiers from Warrior Stances

In Battle Stance and Berserker Stance, all threat from a Warrior is multiplied by 80%. In defensive stance, the multiplier is 130%. With Defiance, it is 145%.

omg, didnt know i was that imba then

xen · Post by **xen** » 04 May 2006, 13:49

Zilver wrote:omg, didnt know i was that imba then

Told you warrior was ez-mode DPS.

Zilver · Post by **Zilver** » 04 May 2006, 13:50

xen wrote:
Zilver wrote:omg, didnt know i was that imba then
Told you warrior was ez-mode DPS.

and people still dont believe we can be

Post by **Fenz** » 04 May 2006, 14:13

Zilver wrote:
xen wrote:
Zilver wrote:omg, didnt know i was that imba then
Told you warrior was ez-mode DPS.
and people still dont believe we can be

I believe that you can be, just didn't bring you along for that!

Zilver · Post by **Zilver** » 04 May 2006, 14:28

Fenz wrote:
Zilver wrote:
xen wrote:
Zilver wrote:omg, didnt know i was that imba then
Told you warrior was ez-mode DPS.
and people still dont believe we can be
I believe that you can be, just didn't bring you along for that!

no offence taken

i know that warlocks cannt look past their own pets